|    |  | nextnano3 - Tutorial2D TutorialFock-Darwin states of a 2D parabolic, anisotropic (elliptical) potential in a magnetic fieldAuthor:
Stefan Birner   ==> This is the old website: 
A new version of this tutorial can be found
here.
    -> 1DGaAs_ParabolicQW_infinite_4_6meV.in-> 1DGaAs_ParabolicQW_infinite_6_1meV.in
 -> 2DGaAs_BiParabolicEllipticQD_Austing.in
 
 
 Fock-Darwin states of a 2D parabolic, anisotropic (elliptical) potential in a magnetic fieldIn this tutorial we study the electron energy levels of a two-dimensional 
parabolic, anisotropic (elliptical) confinement potential 
that is subject to a magnetic field.Such a potential can be constructed by surrounding GaAs with an AlxGa1-xAs 
alloy that has a parabolic alloy profile in the x and y directions.
   First, it is necessary to study the energy states of a 1D parabolic 
confinement.   1D parabolic confinement along the x direction with hbarw0 = 4.6 meV 
(1D simulation)
 -> 1DGaAs_ParabolicQW_infinite_4_6meV.in For similar results and a discussion, we refer to this tutorial:
Parabolic Quantum Well (GaAs / AlAs)   1D parabolic confinement along the y direction with hbarw0 
= 6.1 meV (1D simulation)
 -> 1DGaAs_ParabolicQW_infinite_6_1meV.in For similar results and a discussion, we refer to this tutorial:
Parabolic Quantum Well (GaAs / AlAs)   First, it is a good idea to get familiar with the results of a 2D parabolic 
and isotropic confinement: Fock-Darwin states of a 2D parabolic potential in a magnetic field   Now we turn to the anisotropic confinement...   2D parabolic, anisotropic (elliptical) confinement with hbarwx = 
4.6 meV and and hbarwy = 6.1 meV -Fock-Darwin-like spectrum  (2D simulation)
 -> 2DGaAs_BiParabolicEllipticQD_Austing.in
 
  The electron effective mass in GaAs is me* = 0.067 m0. 
  We assume this value for the effective mass in the whole region (i.e. also 
  inside the AlGaAs alloy).
The following figure shows the parabolic, anisotropic (elliptical) conduction band edge confinement potential, 
	as well as the ground state wave function (psi2) at B = 0 T.In 
  the middle of the sample the conduction band edge is at 
	0 eV and at the boundary 
  region the conduction band edge has the value 0.84 eV. 
	The radii of the ellipse are 300 nm along the x axis and 226 nm along the y 
	axis.
 The parabolic confinement along the x direction is: hbarwx = 
	4.6 meV
 The parabolic confinement along the y direction is: hbarwy = 
	6.1 meV
 Thus the ellipticity is roughly 4/3.
 
 
  
 At zero magnetic field, the eigenvalues for such a system are given by:Enx,ny = (nx + 1/2) hbarwx + (ny + 
1/2) hbar wy
 nx = n + 1/2 |l|
 -1/2 |l|ny = n + 1/2 |l|
 +1/2 |l|for n = 0,1,2,3,... and l = 
0,+
 -1,+-2,...(n = radial quantum number, l = angular momentum quantum number, wx 
and wy = 
oscillator frequencies)
 For more details, see A.V. Madhav, T. Chakraborty, Physical Review B 49, 
8163 (1994).
 The eigenvalue spectrum of a 2D parabolic and isotropic 
potential shows a shell-like structure: 
Energy levels of an "artificial atom" - 2D harmonic potentialFor the anisotropic elliptical potential, this degeneracy at B 
= 0 T is lifted.
 The following figure shows the calculated Fock-Darwin-like spectrum, i.e. the eigenstates as a function of magnetic field magnitude.Here, each of these states is two-fold spin-degenerate. However, a magnetic 
field lifts this degeneracy (Zeeman splitting) but this effect is not taking into account 
  in this tutorial.
 
 
  
  Such a spectrum can be related to experimental transport measurements 
	which 
	give insight into the single-particle energy spectrum of a quantum dot.
 The rectangles in the above figure are related to the figures of the 
	following publications:
 
 cyan rectangle: Fig. 2 of
 Two-level anti-crossings high up in the 
	single-particle energy spectrum of a quantum dot
 C. Payette, D.G. Austing, G. Yu, J.A. Gupta, 
	S.V. Nair, B. Partoens, S. Amaha, S. Tarucha
 arXiv:0710.1035v1 
	[cond-mat.mes-hall] (2007)
 
 green rectangle: Fig. 2(b) of
 red rectangle: Fig. 3(a) of
 Probing by transport the single-particle energy 
	spectrum up to high energy of
 one quantum dot with the ground state of an adjacent 
	weakly coupled quantum dot
 D.G. Austing, G. Yu, C. Payette, J.A. Gupta, M. 
	Korkusinski, G.C. Aers
 physica status solidi (a), 508 (2007)
 
 (Comments red rectangle: In Fig. 3(a) of 
	the publication by Austing et al., the ground state energy has been 
	subtracted from the excited states. Thus the slope of the energy spectrum 
	look slightly different.)
 
 It is interesting to note that there are exact crossings in the calculated spectrum 
	whereas the experiment reveals anti-crossings.
 |