| www.nextnano.com/documentation/tools/nextnano3/tutorials/1D_TightBinding_bulk.html
 
 nextnano3 - Tutorialnext generation 3D nano device simulatorEmpirical tight-binding (sp3s*) band structure of GaAs, GaP, 
AlAs, InAs, C (diamond) and Si
  -> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_GaAs.in-> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_GaAs_so.in
 -> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_Al0.3Ga0.7As.in
 -> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_GaP.in
 -> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_GaP_so.in
 -> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_AlAs.in
 -> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_AlAs_so.in
 -> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_C.in
 -> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_Si.in
 -> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_Ge.in
 -> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_InAs_so.in
 -> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_AlSb_so.in
 -> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_InSb_so.in
 -> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_Al0.5In0.5Sb.in
 
 Empirical tight-binding (sp3s*) band structure of GaAs and GaPThe empirical tight-binding model that is used here is based on the sp3s* 
Hamiltonian, i.e. the 10 x 10 matrix given in Table (A) of 
	[Vogl]A semi-empirical tight-binding theory of the electronic structure of 
	semiconductors
 P. Vogl, H.P. Hjalmarson, J.D. Dow
 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 44 (5), 365 (1983)
 Download the paper including corrections.
   In addition, we include spin-orbit coupling leading to a 20 x 20 matrix.The additional terms arising due to spin-orbit coupling are given for instance 
on p. R5 of
 
	Microscopic theory of nanostructured semiconductor devices: beyond the 
	envelope-function approximationA. Di Carlo
 Semiconductor Science and Technology 18, R1 (2003)
 We note that nowadays much better theoretical methods are available for calculating the 
band structure of bulk materials.However, for educational purposes, the chosen sp3s* method should be 
sufficient.
   In this tutorial, we calculate the bulk band structure of 
	GaAs, GaP and AlAs without    spin-orbit coupling using 
	the parameters of [Vogl]    at T =    
	0 KGaAs, GaP and AlAs including spin-orbit coupling using the parameters 
	of [Klimeck] at T = 300 K 
	[Klimeck]sp3s* Tight-Binding parameters for transport simulations in compound 
	semiconductors
 G. Klimeck, R.C. Bowen, T.B. Boykin, T.A. Cwik
 Superlattices and Microstructures 27 (5), 519 (2000)
   InputThe values for the tight-binding parametrization have to be specified in the 
input file: 
	
	$numeric-control...
 !------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ! Tight-binding parameters for GaAs (values of [Klimeck]). The units are 
	[eV].
 !------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 !tight-binding-parameters = -3.53284           
	! Esa (GaAs)
 0.27772           
	! Epa
 -8.11499           
	! Esc
 4.57341           
	! Epc
 12.33930           
	! Es_a
 4.31241           
	! Es_c
 -6.87653           
	! Vss
 1.33572           
	! Vxx
 5.07596           
	! Vxy
 0.0               
	! Vs_s_
 2.85929           
	! Vsa_pc
 11.09774           
	! Vsc_pa
 6.31619           
	! Vs_a_pc
 5.02335           
	! Vs_c_pa
 0.32703  0.12000  ! Delta_so_a 
	Delta_so_c
 ! Note: a = anion, c = cation
 !       s_ = s*
 For more information about the meaning of these parameters, we refer to the 
above cited references.   OutputThe output of the calculated tight-binding band structure can be found in the 
following file:
 TightBinding/BandStructure.datThe first column contains the number of the grid point in the Brillouin zone.
 These grid points run
 - from L point to Gamma point (along Lambda)
 - from Gamma point to X point (along Delta)
 - from X point to the U,K points
 - from U,K points to Gamma point (along Sigma).
 The next columns are the eigenvalues of the tight-binding Hamiltonian in units 
of [eV] for each grid point in k = (kx,ky,kz) 
space.
 
 The file
 
 TightBinding/BandStructure_without_so.datcontains the tight-binding band structure without spin-orbit coupling.
 The file
 
 TightBinding/k_vectors.datcontains for each point the information to which k point it belongs to.
  no.  kx           
ky           kz       
   |k|          
kx[2pi/a]    ky[2pi/a]    kz[2pi/a]    
|k|[2pi/a]Note: Currently the units of kx, ky and kz 
do not take into account the lattice constant a. This should be modfied.1    0.314159E+01 0.314159E+01 
0.314159E+01 0.544140E+01 0.500000E+00 0.500000E+00 0.500000E+00 
0.866025E+00
 ...
 
The values for kx, ky and kz in units of
  
[2pi/a] are correct, however.Another improvement would be to calculate and output the three-dimensional 
energy dispersion E(kx,ky,kz),
 and two-dimensional slices E(kx,ky,0) through the 
three-dimensional energy dispersion E(kx,ky,kz) 
for a constant value of kz, e.g. kz = 0.
   ResultsGaAs without spin-orbit coupling
-> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_GaAs.in 
 The calculated band structure is in excellent agreement with Fig. 11(d) of 
[Vogl].The conduction band minimum is at the Gamma point (direct band gap).
 Because spin-orbit coupling is not included in the Hamiltonian,
 heavy, light and split-off hole are degenerate at the Gamma point, i.e. at k 
= (kx,ky,kz) = 0.
 The sp3s* empirical tight-binding parameters were taken from
  
[Vogl] at T = 0 K.   GaAs including spin-orbit coupling-> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_GaAs_so.in
 
 The calculated band structure is in excellent agreement with Fig. 1 of 
[Klimeck].The conduction band minimum is at the Gamma point (direct band gap).
 Spin-orbit coupling lifts the degeneracy of heavy/light hole and split-off hole 
at the Gamma point.
 Heavy and light hole are still degenerate at the Gamma point.
 The sp3s* empirical tight-binding parameters were taken from
  
[Klimeck] at T = 300 K.     GaP without spin-orbit coupling-> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_GaP.in
 
 The calculated band structure is in excellent agreement with Fig. 2 of 
[Vogl].The conduction band minimum is calculated to be at the X point (indirect band 
gap).
 Because spin-orbit coupling is not included in the Hamiltonian,
 heavy, light and split-off hole are degenerate at the Gamma point, i.e. at k 
= (kx,ky,kz) = 0.
 The sp3s* empirical tight-binding parameters were taken from
  
[Vogl] at T = 0 K.   GaP including spin-orbit coupling-> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_GaP_so.in
 
 The calculated band structure is in excellent agreement with Fig. 1 of 
[Klimeck].The conduction band minimum is in the vicinity of the X point at the Delta line 
(indirect band gap), so-called camel's back.
 Spin-orbit coupling lifts the degeneracy of heavy/light hole and split-off hole 
at the Gamma point.
 Heavy and light hole are still degenerate at the Gamma point.
 The sp3s* empirical tight-binding parameters were taken from
  
[Klimeck] at T = 300 K.     AlAs without spin-orbit coupling-> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_AlAs.in
   AlAs including spin-orbit coupling-> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_AlAs_so.in
 
   InAs including spin-orbit coupling-> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_InAs_so.in
 
   C (diamond) without spin-orbit coupling-> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_C.in
   Si (silicon) without spin-orbit coupling-> 1D_TightBinding_bulk_Si.in
   The k space resolution, i.e. the number of grid points on the axis of these 
plots can be adjusted.
 
   $tightenThis corresponds tocalculate-tight-binding-tighten = no              
!
 destination-directory           
= TightBinding/
 number-of-k-points              
= 50              
!
 50 k 
points between the Gamma point and the X point.The number of k points along the other directions are scaled 
correspondingly.!
 |